> ## Documentation Index > Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.cbpayapp.com/llms.txt > Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further. # Wallet screening > Assess the AML risk of any blockchain address — sanctions, illicit funds, exposure — before transacting with it export const EnvUrls = ({lang = "en"}) => { const T = { en: { test: "Test", live: "Live", hint: "Same API on both environments — build against test first, then go live by swapping the base URL and the key.", guide: "Environments and testing", href: "/en/environment-testing" }, es: { test: "Test", live: "Live", hint: "La misma API en ambos ambientes — construye primero contra test y pasa a live cambiando la URL base y la key.", guide: "Entorno y pruebas", href: "/es/environment-testing" }, zh: { test: "Test", live: "Live", hint: "两个环境的 API 完全一致——先在 test 环境构建，再通过切换基础 URL 和密钥上线。", guide: "环境与测试", href: "/zh/environment-testing" } }; const t = T[lang] || T.en; const row = (label, url, keyPattern, badgeCls) =>
{label} {url} · {keyPattern}
; return
{row(t.test, "https://cryptobank.qbank.cl/platform", "pk_test_...", "bg-amber-100 text-amber-800 dark:bg-amber-900/40 dark:text-amber-300")} {row(t.live, "https://api.qbank.cl/platform", "pk_...", "bg-emerald-100 text-emerald-800 dark:bg-emerald-900/40 dark:text-emerald-300")}

{t.hint} {t.guide} →

; }; **Wallet screening** evaluates a blockchain address against global on-chain intelligence and returns its risk level: whether it belongs to a sanctioned entity, whether it received funds of illicit origin (ransomware, darknet markets, thefts) and which categories it is exposed to. Use it before sending funds to a third-party address, when a customer hands you a new wallet, or as part of your own compliance program. It is the on-chain counterpart of [AML screening](/en/guides/aml) (which evaluates person/company identities): here the subject is the **address**. ```mermaid theme={"theme":{"light":"github-light","dark":"github-dark"}} flowchart LR scan["POST /v1/screenings/addresses
(charges a fee)"] --> riesgo{"risk"} riesgo -->|"Low / Medium"| ok["Proceed normally"] riesgo -->|"High"| cuidado["Review the details
(exposures and triggers)"] riesgo -->|"Severe"| bloquear["Do not transact
(sanctions / direct illicit)"] ``` The `address_screening` service fee (fixed, per scan) is debited on execution and **automatically refunded** if the screening fails. With a fee of 0 the service is free for you. It requires your own [identity verification approved](/en/guides/kyc#your-own-verification-onboarding) and the `screenings` service enabled on your account. ## Run a screening The assessment is **network-agnostic**: the same address is evaluated across every supported blockchain at once. The `chain` field is optional and only labels your record. Since the scan charges a fee, the `idempotency_key` is **required** — retrying with the same key never charges twice. ```bash theme={"theme":{"light":"github-light","dark":"github-dark"}} curl -X POST https://api.qbank.cl/platform/v1/screenings/addresses \ -H "Authorization: Bearer " \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "address": "TN2BBWc9EF8MMB6i1c4HZHXAssTEXstMDo", "chain": "tron", "idempotency_key": "scan-customer-742-1" }' ``` Response `201` — a clean address: ```json theme={"theme":{"light":"github-light","dark":"github-dark"}} { "screening_id": "5f0b1c9a-2f3e-4a7b-9c1d-8e6f5a4b3c2d", "account_id": "9b1deb4d-3b7d-4bad-9bdd-2b0d7b3dcb6d", "address": "TN2BBWc9EF8MMB6i1c4HZHXAssTEXstMDo", "chain": "tron", "risk": "Low", "screening_fee": "0.500000", "fee_asset": "USDT", "idempotency_key": "scan-customer-742-1", "created_at": "2026-07-12T14:30:00Z", "assessment": { "address": "TN2BBWc9EF8MMB6i1c4HZHXAssTEXstMDo", "risk": "Low", "address_identifications": [], "exposures": [ { "category": "exchange", "value_usd": "1250.75" } ], "triggers": [] } } ``` And a sanctioned address: ```json theme={"theme":{"light":"github-light","dark":"github-dark"}} { "screening_id": "7a2c4e6f-8b1d-4c3a-9e5f-1a2b3c4d5e6f", "account_id": "9b1deb4d-3b7d-4bad-9bdd-2b0d7b3dcb6d", "address": "0x098B716B8Aaf21512996dC57EB0615e2383E2f96", "chain": "eth", "risk": "Severe", "risk_reason": "Identified as Sanctioned Entity", "screening_fee": "0.500000", "fee_asset": "USDT", "idempotency_key": "scan-suspicious-9", "created_at": "2026-07-12T14:31:00Z", "assessment": { "address": "0x098B716B8Aaf21512996dC57EB0615e2383E2f96", "risk": "Severe", "risk_reason": "Identified as Sanctioned Entity", "cluster_name": "OFAC SDN Ronin Bridge Exploiter", "cluster_category": "sanctioned entity", "address_identifications": [ { "name": "SANCTIONS: OFAC SDN Ronin Bridge Exploiter", "category": "sanctioned entity", "description": "This specific address 0x098b716b8aaf21512996dc57eb0615e2383e2f96 within this cluster has been identified as belonging to a sanctioned entity." } ], "exposures": [], "triggers": [] } } ``` Apply your policy on `risk` (level table below). The `assessment` object carries the full evidence for your records: point identifications, USD exposure per category and the risk rules triggered. Retrying with the same `idempotency_key` returns the original screening with `idempotency_hit: true` and **does not charge again**: ```json theme={"theme":{"light":"github-light","dark":"github-dark"}} { "screening_id": "5f0b1c9a-2f3e-4a7b-9c1d-8e6f5a4b3c2d", "account_id": "9b1deb4d-3b7d-4bad-9bdd-2b0d7b3dcb6d", "address": "TN2BBWc9EF8MMB6i1c4HZHXAssTEXstMDo", "risk": "Low", "screening_fee": "0.500000", "fee_asset": "USDT", "idempotency_key": "scan-customer-742-1", "created_at": "2026-07-12T14:30:00Z", "idempotency_hit": true } ``` ## Query the history Every screening is stored. The list requires `from`/`to` and supports pagination and a risk filter: ```bash theme={"theme":{"light":"github-light","dark":"github-dark"}} curl "https://api.qbank.cl/platform/v1/screenings/addresses?from=2026-07-01&to=2026-07-12&risk=severe&page=1&page_size=50" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer " ``` ```json theme={"theme":{"light":"github-light","dark":"github-dark"}} { "page": 1, "page_size": 50, "screenings": [ { "screening_id": "7a2c4e6f-8b1d-4c3a-9e5f-1a2b3c4d5e6f", "account_id": "9b1deb4d-3b7d-4bad-9bdd-2b0d7b3dcb6d", "address": "0x098B716B8Aaf21512996dC57EB0615e2383E2f96", "chain": "eth", "risk": "Severe", "risk_reason": "Identified as Sanctioned Entity", "screening_fee": "0.500000", "fee_asset": "USDT", "idempotency_key": "scan-suspicious-9", "created_at": "2026-07-12T14:31:00Z" } ] } ``` And the detail by id (includes the full `assessment`): ```bash theme={"theme":{"light":"github-light","dark":"github-dark"}} curl https://api.qbank.cl/platform/v1/screenings/addresses/7a2c4e6f-8b1d-4c3a-9e5f-1a2b3c4d5e6f \ -H "Authorization: Bearer " ``` ## Risk levels | `risk` | What it means | What to do | | - | - | - | | `Low` | No relevant risk signals | Proceed normally | | `Medium` | Minor exposure to risk categories | Proceed; consider keeping an internal record | | `High` | Significant exposure to illicit funds | Review `exposures`/`triggers` before transacting | | `Severe` | Sanctioned entity or direct illicit activity | **Do not transact** with the address | Levels are **final** (a screening is a snapshot at query time): if you need to re-assess the same address later, run a fresh scan with a new `idempotency_key`. ## Automatic protection (free of charge) Beyond on-demand screening, the platform **protects your crypto operations automatically and for free**: * **On-chain withdrawals**: the destination address is assessed before signing. If it is severe-risk, the withdrawal is rejected and the held amount is **fully refunded** to your balance (you will see the withdrawal `failed` with `core_rejected` and its `crypto_withdrawal_status_changed` webhook). * **Incoming deposits**: the sender of every deposit is assessed before crediting. A severe-risk sender leaves the deposit **held for compliance review** (`crypto_deposit_held` webhook); a high-risk one is credited normally with an informational alert (`crypto_deposit_alert` webhook). A held deposit is NOT lost: your operator's compliance team reviews it and decides to release it (it is credited with its normal funding fee) or reject it. If you receive a `crypto_deposit_held`, contact your operator with the `tx_id`. ## Webhooks | Event | When | | - | - | | `crypto_deposit_held` | An incoming deposit was held due to sender risk | | `crypto_deposit_alert` | A deposit was credited but the sender shows high risk (informational) | ```json crypto_deposit_held theme={"theme":{"light":"github-light","dark":"github-dark"}} { "account_id": "ae8c…", "hold_id": "c1d2e3f4-…", "chain": "tron", "asset": "usdt", "tx_id": "8a5b3c…", "risk": "Severe", "status": "held" } ``` Subscribe just like the rest of the events (see [Webhooks](/en/webhooks)). ## Errors | HTTP | `error` | Cause | Solution | | - | - | - | - | | 400 | `idempotency_key_required` | Missing idempotency key | Send `idempotency_key` in the body or the `Idempotency-Key` header | | 400 | `invalid_payload` | Missing `address` or it is too long | Check the `address` field | | 400 | `invalid_range` | Missing or invalid `from`/`to` on the list | Use `YYYY-MM-DD` for both | | 402 | `insufficient_funds` | Insufficient balance for the fee | Fund the account and retry with the SAME key | | 403 | `verification_required` | Your account has not passed verification yet | Complete your [onboarding](/en/guides/kyc#your-own-verification-onboarding) | | 403 | `service_disabled` | The `screenings` service is disabled for your account | Contact your operator | | 404 | `not_found` | The `screening_id` does not exist or is not yours | Check the id | | 422 | `invalid_address` | The address could not be screened (format) | Check the address format | | 502 | `screening_unavailable` | Service temporarily unavailable (the fee was refunded) | Retry later with the SAME key | ## FAQ No. The assessment covers every supported network at once: an ETH address is evaluated with all of its known on-chain activity. `chain` is just an optional label for your own records. Yes. The product accepts any blockchain address — that is exactly the use case of assessing a third party before transacting with them. Each scan charges its fee. A screening is a snapshot at query time and is stored as evidence with its date. An address' risk can change (new sanctions, new activity): for sensitive decisions, re-assess with a fresh scan. No. The automatic screening of withdrawals and deposits is part of the platform's compliance program and has no cost. Only the on-demand scan (`POST /v1/screenings/addresses`) charges the `address_screening` fee. For safety, withdrawals are not signed without assessing the destination: the withdrawal is rejected with a full refund and you can retry later. Incoming deposits are NOT held because of a service outage — they are credited normally. This documentation is built and hosted on [Mintlify](https://mintlify.com), a developer documentation platform.